🔗 Share this article

An unexpected contact on LinkedIn. An offer of work from a headhunter, probably a young woman, operating from the Asian nation. The chance to earn around £20,000 part-time writing a handful of political reports for a Chinese company containing “non-public” or privileged information. Payment in digital currency or physical money favored.

It may seem clear, in this scenario, that an element about this approach would be suspicious. However, China’s powerful Ministry of State Security continues to view it valuable to deploy recruitment consultants to try it – leading the domestic spy agency to warn repeatedly about their activity on the internet.

Massive Contact Attempts on Professional Networks

Last year, MI5 chief Ken McCallum said Chinese agents were contacting Britons on the platform on an unprecedented level, at a rate of ten thousand over the previous 30-month period, attempting to obtain political, commercial, defense and technological classified information. However a fresh campaign targeting politicians and parliament has prompted the spy agency to act again.

A spying alert was issued on Tuesday via the offices of the Commons speaker and his Lords counterpart: a single slide after the persistent attempts of Shirly Shen and Amanda Qiu to contact MPs, peers, their assistants, economists, thinktanks – anyone who might become a source.

Intelligence Strategy and Legal Changes

In the typical style of UK security services, there was no publication of the security advice from the agency or the Home Office. Yet the agency was aware its advisory document would become public once it was sent electronically out to Westminster. Republishing it in the press helps the general population more easily recognize interactions with a fraudulent purpose.

The alert has the effect of flushing out additional details from within parliament, although that is not MI5’s main objective. The service wants public figures to understand that just because interactions on professional networks are less overtly risky as on other social platforms, it does not mean they are completely safe.

Nor is internal security service believed to have been responding to any specific incident in the legislature, although the burst of activity does come after the awkward collapse of the prosecution of a ex-assistant an individual and his associate another person on a technicality in recent months.

The two had been accused of spying for the foreign power – a charge they rejected – but inability to successfully conclude a prosecution under the since replaced previous legislation led to concerns that British democracy had been left unprotected.

Revised Laws and Beijing's Strategic Interests

Legislation has now been changed, and the MI5 slide includes a note of its successor: “Individuals involved in spying operations face significant criminal penalties under the National Security Act.” It is a criminal offense if a person participates in conduct that is or is likely to “significantly help a overseas spy agency”.

An obvious question, though, is what Beijing has to achieve. An elected representative who is not a government minister will have limited knowledge of classified material, and an associate of theirs even less. But the Chinese government is also interested in parliament: for a period, in 2020 and 2021, the Britain's approach to China on issues such as the telecom firm or the human rights situation or genocide was being driven by MPs.

Cultural Variations and Persistent Cyber Threats

To a degree there are distinct approaches as well. Authoritarian governments like Beijing's utilize intelligence collection techniques and the scale of its spy network is enormous, engaging three hundred thousand individuals. A former US official, a US national cyber director under the US administration, said it was sometimes estimated that “China have more English speakers engaged in this than we [western intelligence] have personnel with language skills”.

The Chinese government is prepared to cultivate people over the extended period and sometimes even the agencies have struggled to differentiate genuine connections and espionage. “China has a minimal requirement for what information is considered to be of value,” security minister a government official informed MPs on this week, but a sudden turn in the political cycle may result in an individual rapidly peripheral turning significant.

Another way to consider the continuous efforts at covert information gathering is in the broader framework of the international competition between China and the west at a threshold under the point of outright war. China has stepped up its hacking efforts, with the Salt Typhoon penetration of communications systems in 80 countries, and the Volt Typhoon breach of countless internet devices.

Beijing is engaged in relentless efforts to find secret informants on UK politics via digital means because it seeks to be challenging, to display influence and because it can.